An Insight Into The Coefficient Of Inbreeding (COI) in Dog Breeding

I have been a GSD enthusiast and sharing my life with Shepherds for over two and a half decades. I have been a keen and close observer of what's going on the breeding platforms. Insofar my observation, many of the breeders (not all though) are not sparing serious thoughts on Popular Sire Syndrome while continuously breeding their dogs. Sadly, many others have not even heard of Popular Sire Syndrome, still breeding; and breeding just for cash!
This is an crisp aareness post for spread the words out about Popular Sire Syndrome and high coefficient of inbreeding (COI)
The Popular Sire Syndrome is a phenomenon in dog breeding where a few top-performing stud dogs are extensively used in breeding programs, resulting in the majority of offspring within a breed being closely related to a small number of popular sires.
The syndrome can occur when breeders choose to breed their females to popular, successful stud dogs without considering their genetic diversity or potential for passing on hereditary health problems. This can lead to an increase in the COI within the breed, a reduction in genetic diversity, and an increased risk of inherited health problems.
While using successful stud dogs can help to improve certain desirable traits, such as conformation or temperament, breeding only from a small pool of popular sires can lead to a loss of genetic diversity and an increased risk of inherited health problems. Over time, this can have serious implications for the health and well-being of the breed as a whole.
To avoid the popular sire syndrome, breeders should strive to maintain genetic diversity by choosing breeding partners with low COIs and carefully evaluating the health and temperament of both parents. By avoiding overuse of popular sires and working to maintain genetic diversity within the breed, breeders can help to ensure the long-term health and viability of the breed.
How the dog breeders going wrong by unknowingly contributing to Popular Sire Syndrome?
There are several ways in which dog breeders may unknowingly contribute to the Popular Sire Syndrome:
Focusing only on physical traits: Breeders may choose to breed their dogs based solely on physical characteristics, such as coat color or conformation, without considering the genetic diversity of the breeding pair.
Breeding without proper health screening: If breeders do not perform proper health screening before breeding their dogs, they may inadvertently pass on hereditary health problems to their offspring, which can become more prevalent in the breed if popular sires are used extensively.
Breeding too closely related dogs: If breeders repeatedly breed closely related dogs, such as siblings or parents and offspring, they increase the COI and reduce genetic diversity in the breed.
Lack of knowledge about COI: Some breeders may not fully understand the concept of the coefficient of inbreeding (COI) and the importance of maintaining genetic diversity within the breed.
Important Reads (Not to be missed)
An Insight Into The Coefficient Of Inbreeding (COI) in Dog Breeding
How to Calculate Coefficient Of Inbreeding (COI)
To avoid contributing to the popular sire syndrome, breeders should focus on selecting breeding partners with low COIs and carefully evaluating the health and temperament of both parents. Breeders should also work to expand the gene pool by incorporating new bloodlines into their breeding programs and by avoiding breeding too closely related dogs. Finally, breeders should educate themselves about the importance of maintaining genetic diversity in their breeding programs and the risks of the popular sire syndrome.
Read more...
German Shepherd Dog Breeding Goal
Performance & DNA Tests Should Be a Must For Ethical Dog Breeding Practice
In an attempt to spread an awareness of ethical practice for dog breeding, Aringsburg German Shepherd Dog Bloggers seek to bring in this chapter that talks about how DNA tests can contribute in evaluating breeding values. Not only owners, but aspiring dog breeders should be benefited from this chapter and may be more inclined towards setting a breeding goal, aiming towards scientifically eliminating genetic defects – both mental and physical.
Breeding Value for a Dog: So what is this? Breeding value for a specific dog is the set of genetically governed qualities that helps you decide whether to breed him/her or not. Since breeding goal should be development of the breed by eliminating defects and carriers of defective traits, a dog is considered to have a higher breeding value if it genetically close to the standard, insofar psychological, physiological and physical traits are concerned and is capable to pass on the strong traits to its progenitors, which in turn contributes to the breed development. Dog breeding values can be effectively evaluated by understanding the degree of contribution a dog (dam or sire or both) can genetically make. Passing on the traits (desirable or undesirable) to progenitors is simply quite natural.
Evaluating the statistical estimation of breeding value can be done through:
1) Testing the performance of direct parents, close relatives and their progenitors
2) Testing the DNA of direct parents, their offspring, close relatives and their progenitors
Performance Test to Evaluate Breeding Value: Dog breeders should adopt the practice of evaluating breeding value, and clubs and canine organizations have to encourage breeders to keep closer eye their dogs’ overall performance with respect to behavior, temperament, traits, gait, and other physical and psychological features. Success can be achieved only through testing 100% of the offspring and it should be an ongoing and consistent process. In an article appeared in GKF Info 26 Dec. 2007, pages 13-19, Gesellschaft zur Förderung Kynologischer Forschung e.V., Bonn, Germany, Dr. Helga Eichelberg said it right: “breed clubs must look after the prerequisite, which is to find ways to increase the rate of performance testing and making the data available.” (Translated in English by Joe Schmutz)
DNA Tests to Evaluate Breeding Value: DNA tests for dogs are not yet available everywhere, which is an excuse for overwhelmingly growing numbers of backyard breeders for not getting a chance to effectively determining the breeding value of their dogs. Implementing the practice of DNA tests in dog breeding will efficiently filter out the genetic defects, which should be the one most important breeding goal. Through DNA tests more and more complicated traits can be determined to contribute to the evaluation process of breeding value. Proper DNA tests will help filtering out the defects and undesirable traits and characteristics and also effectively filter out the carriers of defective psychological, physiological and physical characteristics.
DNA tests are important to evaluate the actual genetic characteristics of a dog. Even if a dog has a rich bloodline with all desirable traits, still more complex and subtle undesirable traits may not be noticeable without an appropriate DNA trait. A seemingly close to perfect dog when combined with a very good female with apparently high heritable qualities may still produce unreliable progenitors with subtle or pronounced defects. Very nice dogs may still have siblings that many educated and ethical breeders may consider as unreliable and non-breedable. DNA tests help to effective determine all strengths and weaknesses of a dog which helps a breeder to make valuable decision when it comes to breeding his dogs.
Takeaways From This Chapter:
Dog breeding is a serious activity that demands a responsible approach that should be backed with scientific knowledge and an inclination towards breed development, and not just making money. Emotional approach in breeding dog is bound to make mess.
Great Related Read On GSD: True type German Shepherds have typical basic instincts that should be retained while breeding. FCI - Fédération Cynologique Internationale has drafted German Shepherd standard which need to be kept in the forefront of your mind while breeding GSD. Check out FCI GSD Standard. GSD breeders should draft an effective and scientific breeding goal to eliminate of defects
Read more...
![]() |
1933 Sieger Odin vom Stolzenfels Born: 07 April 1930 |
![]() |
Left - Odin Stolzenfels & Right - Hektor Schwaben |
![]() |
1958-sieger-Condor-vom-Hohenstamm Born May 1st, 1954 Breeder & Owner - E. Franke; Lunen (Westfalen) |
![]() |
1962 Sieger, Mutz aus der Kuckstrasse Born: 19 April, 1958; Breeder - F. Hesse (Hannover); Owner - Erich Franke |
![]() | ||
|
![]() |
1973-74 Sieger, Dick von Adeloga (2x VA1) Born: March 1, 1971 |
![]() |
1977 VA1 Herzog von Adeloga Born: December 1, 1973 |
However, it is important at this phase of the article to state something very interesting! The year 1976 marked a significant change in the GSD SV Standard. The standard was slightly, yet significantly altered to bring in a very specific description and interrelation of the back and the withers. Until 1976 the reference of withers and the back in the standard was: "back straight, between withers and croup not too long". Surprisingly, it was really as simple as this!
Please Note: The word "Straight" was NOT used to mean "Level", contrary to the popular belief - then and even now. Straight back was used and is still used to indicate a spine that doesn't give an egg shaped back that tend to give a lowered hip position and impacts the top line and its slope.
The back, withers and croup in the amended German Shepherd Standard of 1976 described as this: "back including the loin straight and strongly developed, not too long between the withers and croup. The withers must be long and high enough to be well indicated against the back into which it must gently flow without disrupting the backline which should be slightly sloping front to rear."
![]() | |
|
![]() |
2X VA1 Uran vom Wildsteiger Land 1984 + 1985 Sieger, Born: March 12, 1981 Breeder: Martin Göbl and Maria Göbl |
![]() |
VA1 Jeck vom Noricum 1993 Sieger Born: August 4, 1987 |
![]() |
Nero vom Hirschel 1994 VA5 Born: September 20, 1990 |
![]() |
Odin von Hirschell 1998 VA4 Born: March 8, 1995 ↓ |
![]() |
VA1 Bax von Luisenstrasse 2003 Sieger Born: April 19, 1999 ↓ |
![]() |
VA1 Pakros d'Ulmental 2007 Sieger Born: April 4, 2002 ↓ |
![]() |
2X VA1 Vegas du Haut Mansard 2008 + 2009 Sieger Born: March 16, 2004 |
Quantum Arminius >> Zamp Thermodos line, however, exaggerated sloping top line. Some of the Zamp Thermodos' progenies have shown over angulated hind - close to the ground, with metatarsus of hind legs, being placed nearly flat on the ground. This tend to compromise strides and reach.
While on the other hand, the Nero vom Hirschel >> Odin von Hirschell line exhibited the rise in the lumber area but did not showed any exaggeration in slope of top line. Most dog of this line did not come up with overly angulated hinds and not close to the ground. Most dogs in this line exhibited better strides while trotting.
According to the documentation of FCI standard [23.12.2010/EN (FCI-Standard N° 166)] of German Shepherd Dog
The standard did not depict the exact requirement of the top line in that document. However has given a very clear indication that the top line should not be impacted while gaiting. We see many dogs in the rings of many prestigious shows, lacking balance as they tend to lift their fronts up rather than proceeding forward. There are, however, many specimens seen with nicely sloped top line and croup with balanced built.
Instead of following a trend it is important to understand the correlation between wither, top line, back and croup and plan the breeding program like wise.
© Our Blogger Template for Aringsburg's German Shepherd Dogs
Back to TOP